"Andrew Wyeth: Memory and Magic"By Robert Ayers
Published: April 13, 2006
He is determined and industrious. He is modest and makes no fancy shows. He has a certainty of vision and he adheres to it. His is an elemental America: one in which hardworking folk live in close interdependence with nature. They work the land or they fish, not always successfully. And they are constantly aware of death. In 2006, in other words, Wyeth’s America is pure hokum.
Even when a wind blows through it, Wyeth’s world is marked by
stillness. In the thoughtful text panel that accompanies a painting called
Renfield (1999) we read that, “Wyeth rarely makes reference to the modern
world in his art.”
The question of stylistic development during Wyeth’s career is
perplexing. He veered more obviously toward some aspects of European surrealism
in a number of paintings in the 1940s, but in the bigger scheme of things, he
doesn’t really develop at all. Consequently, this show can be arranged
thematically, with paintings made decades apart hanging side by side without any
sense of technical rupture. No doubt Wyeth, and probably this show’s curators,
would see this as a reflection of ‘timelessness,’ but I think the truth is that
in most of his art Wyeth’s character is that of an illustrator, who developed
his techniques early on and saw no need to alter them. And why should he?
Wyeth is, nevertheless, enormously popular. Even on the beautiful Tuesday afternoon that I visited the show, it was so jam-packed that it was literally impossible to move in one or two places. And not just in the first couple of rooms. Even in the final room, people stood dutifully listening to their acoustic guides and seemed to love everything about it.
So is this show worth the admission? Yes, it certainly is.
Not just because it has been assembled with enthusiasm and erudition. Not just
because Wyeth is a scintillating painterly technician. But because at the center
of his art—and perhaps one of the reasons why he kept all those pictures of
Helga Testorf secret for so long—there is a small body of more or less unadorned
portraiture that is undoubtedly major. |