San Francisco: Anthropomorphic Sculpture and Gastonomical DelightsBy Laura Richard Janku
Published: February 14, 2007
MUSEUM EXHIBITION
Mills College Art Museum Sampling, dubbing, riffing, overlaying, cribbing. Whether postmodern redux, overt homage or ironic allusion, appropriation has become the coin of the creative realm. In “Take 2: Women Revisiting Art History,” Janet Bishop (curator of painting and sculpture at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art), reveals how wonderfully varied, poignant and thought provoking the “repurposing” of art can be. In the galleries at Mills College, marquis names—Sherry Levine, Cindy Sherman, Sam Taylor-Wood, Kara Walker—share wall and floor space with emerging and mid-career local artists, including Stephanie Syjuco and Catherine Wagner. Meanwhile rising stars Janine Antoni, Beate Gütschow and Shahzia Sikander (recent winner of a MacArthur “genius grant”) round out the panoply of talent and genres that use art historical precedents as fodder for critical issues. Some cite specific works while others utilize conventional genres as catalysts for contemporary dialogues. Sherman, for instance, inserts herself into photographic recreations of period paintings; Gutschow recasts 16th-century landscapes into digitally manipulated c-prints; Levine mimicks the Old Masters; and Taylor-Wood literally activates a still-life. Syjuco too uses technology to reframe: Her digital prints deploy the tropes of scientific or natural history illustration—and all of its imperial implications—to describe species of the newest frontier: computer accessories and peripherals. Similar investigations of diasporic identity and visual tradition pervade Sikander’s gouaches, which update miniature painting by remixing its traditional form and content, and Walker’s black-and-white cut paper silhouettes, which shadow slavery’s legacy. However, it is Antoni’s sculptures and installations that manifest the most diverse, personal rechanneling of art history. Umbilical, a sculpture of a spoon with a mouth on one end and traces of fingers on the other, was cast from her family silver. This cheeky piece transcends pun—“biting the hand that feeds,” “born with a silver spoon in her mouth”—to investigate the traditions of religious imagery, as well as the daily objects that shape and define generational relationships. All these works are predicated by tension—between painting and photography, figurative vs. representational, historical vs. contemporary, patriarchy vs. feminism. And by taking the dirty word “derivative” by the horns, these artists swallow their source material whole and regurgitate fresh new renditions that comment as much on art history as neo-feminist practices and contemporary culture. GALLERY EXHIBITIONS
Jack Hanley Gallery At the Jack Hanley Gallery, a panoply of DIY critters make their home amid apocalyptic landscapes of stained and polyurethaned wood overlaid with highly textured, spattered paint in earthy browns, silvers and oranges. Their cartoony dispositions—wide-set eyes and fake fur coats—are offset by nasty quips: “I’d rather see you suffer than thrive,” says one fur ball to another. Schadenfreude or dark humor? The answer lies in Jon Pylypchuk’s sculptural installations. In his latest collection of works, the artist’s anthropomorphized species—hybrid walruses, sheep and cats—seen patched together from fake fur, socks, felt, fabric scraps and wood, appear less threatening than usual. Perhaps it’s the lack of offending speech bubbles, but their Frankenstein-like craftiness, bizarre vignettes and humorous titles (Your life is a mess and Watch it sucker now I have two husbands) are as benign here as they are disarming.
|
advertisements
|